Five-Tiered Approarch to Parent Education Chart
| Tier 1: Needs Assessment | |
| Data to Collect/Analyze | Program Data Examples and Possible Resources |
|---|---|
Extant data on target population and services currently available. Interviews with community leaders. Interviews or surveys from prospective participants. Information about similar programs in other locations. |
Demographics (community/school district, region, state, nation) Contact state demographer. Environmental scan of existing programs and services offered throughout community. Assessment of needs of parents themselves. Should be done on ongoing basis informally and formally to adapt to changes in demographics of community. Needs assessment resources: From Needs Assessment to Action: Transforming Needs into Solution Strategies by James W. Altschuld & Belle Ruth Witkin and Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide by Belle Ruth Witkin & James W. Altschuld. |
| Tier 2: Monitoring and Accountability | |
| Data to Collect/Analyze | Program Data Examples and Possible Resources |
MIS (management information system) data; collected at program, county and/or state level. Case material obtained from interviews with clients, record reviews, etc. Community reactions to program |
Details on intensity of services or types of service delivery. Individual level of participation; classroom environment and interaction such as classroom content (support, information, skills), instructional strategies, number of hours participation (have portfolio/file on each parent/family), interaction between educator(s) and parent(s)/child(ren). Further reading on intensity of participation can be found through Harvard Family Research Project (HFRP).
Annual Report and Participant Questionnaire forms for on-line data reporting. Examples:
|
| Tier 3: Quality Review and Program Clarification | |
| Data to Collect/Analyze | Program Data Examples and Possible Resources |
MIS data. Case material. Qualitative and quantitative data on program operations, customer satisfaction and perceived effects; obtained using questionnaires, interviews, observations, and focus groups. |
Details on content and program implementation (e.g. Parent Education Core Curriculum Framework) Staff assessments and performance reviews within agency guidelines and requirements. Parent ed core competencies—a possible framework is available from the Parent Education Center at the University of Maine Cooperative Extension: Goals, purposes/mission, guiding principles of program (e.g., answers to commonly asked questions about program). Use of quality indicators/rating systems (e.g. ECFE Quality Indicators).
Use of program enhancement processes (e.g. ECFE Program Enhancement Process Manual)
Parent goal setting. Parent growth/change—individual and aggregated—for assessing parent satisfaction and improving instruction (e.g. Forest Lake ECFE & Hopkins ECFE). Based on individual programs.
Harry Ireton’s instruments: http://www.ChildDevelopmentReview.com Development of program logic model: http://npen.org/work/evaluating/1.html#oneb |
| Tier 4: Progress Toward Achievement of Outcomes | |
| Data to Collect/Analyze | Program Data Examples and Possible Resources |
Client-specific data; obtained using questionnaires, interviews, goal attainment scaling, observations, and functional indicators. Community and client social indicators. MIS data. |
Parent Growth Inventory (PGI): Observational measure available by e-mailing here. Forest Lake and Hopkins ECFE Parent Education Evaluation
Parent Self-Assessment on-line version developed by H. Wallace Goddard.
Christa Treichel’s four assessments designed for parent education and support programs: one about parent-child interaction, one about child development knowledge, one about discipline knowledge, and another tool for working with parents of critically ill or premature infants. Contact Christa Treichel for more information. Parents As Teachers: http://www.parentsasteachers.org. Robert Strom Parent as a Teacher Inventory (PAAT): http://www.public.asu.edu/~rdstrom/paatm.html Case studies. HFRP Evaluation Exchange Catalog of Family Process Measures (In the HFRP Evaluation Exchange, issue 28).
Dimensions of parenting behavior associated with different indicators of school readiness to informoutcomes and indicators.
Various links with different types of overviews:
|
| Tier 5: Establishing Program Impact | |
| Data to Collect/Analyze | Program Data Examples and Possible Resources |
Client-specific data, obtained using questionnaires, interviews, goal attainment scaling, observations, and functional indicators. Community and client social indicators. MIS data. Comparable data for comparison group. |
Research on different models/approaches impacting parent and child outcomes and link between parent outcomes and child outcomes. Primarily the responsibility of researchers; test links among program logic model components.
|
| Source: Adapted from Jacobs, F., Kapuscik, J., Kates, E., & Williams, P. (2001). Making it count: Evaluating family preservation services. Medford, MA: Tufts University, Family Preservation Evaluation Project. | |
